In 2023, an unprecedented number of rallies and demonstrations including the burning of the Holy Koran broke out in Scandinavia, namely Sweden and Denmark. These demonstrations sparked lively discussions and debates. Following is an analysis of social media posts and the timeline of the events. Click here to download this report in PDF

On 21 January 2023, Danish right-wing politician Rasmus Paludan burned a copy of Koran in front of the Turkish Embassy in Stockholm, drawing widespread reactions. The Swedish authorities had given him an official permission to do it. The event happened amid tension between Turkey and Sweden over the latter’s NATO membership. On 22 January, protests were held against his actions, torching the Swedish flag in front of the Swedish Consulate in Turkey. In response, a sign reading “We do not share that book burning idiot’s view” appeared on the window of the Swedish Consulate in Istanbul.

Source: VOBLYA/ Telegram

On 23 January 2023, Turkish President, Recep Tayyip Erdogan said that Sweden should not expect Turkey’s support for its NATO membership after a protest near Turkish embassy in Stockholm. The same day, Edwin Wagensveld, far-right Dutch politician, and leader of the anti-Islam group Pegida in Netherlands tore up a copy of Koran in The Hague.

Then, Rasmus Paludan burned the Koran again in front of a mosque in Copenhagen, Denmark.

Source: VOBLYA/ Telegram

The action caused widespread outrage. Demonstrations in defense of the Koran were held in Jordan and the UK.

Rasmus Paludan then posted a video in which he responded to the insults of Swedish-Chechen wrestler Khamzat Chivaev, who condemned the Koran burning. This time, Paludan threatened to burn Koran again in front of the doors of the Russian Embassy.

Rasmus Paludan then posted a video of him burning the Koran in front of the Russian Embassy, saying that he was doing it because of the wrestler Khamzat Chimaev, as well as because of Chechen leader Ramzan Kadyrov (Chechnya is a republic of Russia with predominant Muslim population).

Ramzan Kadyrov reacted to this event by saying “…while there are such ruthless individuals in the world who burn the Koran and insult the feelings of more than a billion inhabitants of the Earth, we will not stop at the destruction of Satanists in Ukraine. […] We will go through all of Europe, cleansing the peoples of the Old World from abomination.” He also stated that the politician would be punished, and the authorities who allowed the action would be to blame. Kadyrov spoke metaphorically about the consequences of this act that it was not the terrorists who were shooting at the rabid dog, but the orderlies. He called Rasmus a “religious terrorist who needs to be cleared from the Earth”.

Reactions

Amy Mek, member of the RAIR organization, which proclaims its goal to defeat the threat from Islamic supremacists, radical leftists and their allies, posted:

Among the replies that support her point of view, there are those that claim that the author misunderstood the meaning of the scripture.

And those supporting the author:

Indonesia and Pakistan were among the countries who strongly condemned the burnings.

Thus, the first wave of Koran burnings began with the initiative of the far-right Stram Kurs (Hard Line) party, namely its leader Rasmus Paludan. He takes an extremely hostile stance towards Islam. During his career, he was repeatedly accused of Nazism and racism. In addition, he has been performing such rallies since 2019, which also caused unrest in Sweden and Denmark. However, the events of 2023 allegedly have a different motivation behind them. Rasmus was accused of having links with Russia, which sought to prevent Sweden from joining NATO. According to ‘The Insider’, the campaign with the burning of the Koran was paid for by journalist Chang Frik, who was previously associated with a Russian state-funded channel ‘RT’. ‘The Insider’ also stated that far-right parties around the world may be sponsored by the Russian regime. Moreover, “TV4” revealed Paludan’s connection with the Wagner Group of Russia, which he denied.

Social Media Discussion

Social media reactions to Rasmus’s act varied from neutral to extreme. Following is an analysis of the reactions.

The first opinion shared by users is a neutral position that is expressed in bad feelings about Sweden. However, this narrative doesn’t impose any specific actions or inclining towards any of the sides of the conflict. This group is the smallest in this case:

The second group is expressed by two positions: users undermining the concept of democracy in Sweden, stating that no decision-making power is given to the people and neutral reaction or opinions provided in favor of Muslim community. It’s expressed by the statement that Koran burnings do not cause a violent reaction. These posts also consist of condemnation of the burning of a holy book as an incorrect and unprogressive way of expressing one’s opinion. Such statements do not contain direct aggression or threats.

Next narrative is that Sweden knew what it was doing when it brought migrants, so it should have expected the conflict of civilizations in the first place. The distinguishing feature of this rhetoric is that it does not contain explicit hatred towards migrants, but nevertheless seeks to prove that Western and Islamic values are incompatible.

The next trend in discussion is a narrative that actively uses mocking and black humor to convey Islamophobic remarks.

Another position that fits into the defined level of hate speech scale is anti-migrants rhetoric which also is reflected into the Koran burnings discussion. However, this level is filled with intolerance and explicit expressions.

The analysis of the discourse helped identifying couple of emerging trends. Among them – new slang addressing the recent issues, for example “get Charlie Hebdo-ed” and “to Life of Brian” referencing the bringing up religious topics movie.

Discussing Rasmus’ motivation, users were more inclined to the following versions: he does it for the sake of attention, he wants to provoke the Islamic community, he does it so that NATO does not accept Sweden.
The mood changed a little after Kalla Fakta (Cold Facts)’s publication of his ties to Russia, however, according to users, they were not surprised.

Comment
by from discussion
insweden

Translation: “I’m not surprised, I didn’t assume he was bought by the Russians, but I assumed he wanted to create chaos. When you see this, I’m not surprised, it’s quite logical, but it wasn’t something I thought from the beginning.”

It is worth noting, taking into account possible Russian impact, on May 25, the Koran was burned in front of the mosque in Russia. Moreover, this was done by a person who for many years supported Russian government and the course of pro-state propaganda, as indicated on his pages in social networks. He was convicted and sent to Chechnya. The defendant himself claims that he did it on the order of Ukraine.

Thus, the burning of the Koran by Rasmus Paludan caused a wave of condemnation in society within Sweden, throughout Scandinavia, as well as in a number of Muslim countries. At the same time, his actions also found words of support among social network users who expressed themselves both for and against the burning of the Koran. Moreover, their position depended not only on their personal attitude towards Islam. However, the discussion took on a completely different level when the Koran burnings continued in June and were committed by a different person. Late June, Salwan Momika, an immigrant from Iraq, set fire to a Koran in the center of Stockholm.

If Rasmus Paludan pursued political goals and his actions were explained by the views and ideology of the party, then the motivation of Salwan Momika is explained by different reasons. Momika sought to protest against the covenants and rules of Islam, which he finds incorrect.

Another significant difference in their actions is the language of their conduct, and hence the audience to which the action is directed. Initially, Paludan produced Islamophobic videos in Swedish, he also used English when the events began to gain international resonance. Momika has a TikTok account, and on August 15, he created a channel in the Telegram app. Both resources are maintained by him mainly in Arabic. The description of his Telegram channel says: “Fighting Islam, spreading awareness, freedom, science, peace, and enlightenment thought revolution, breaking the barrier of fear, overthrowing the false sanctity of the Koran, and building generations armed with science, peace, and freedom.”

In this Telegram channel, he expresses disapproval of the precepts of Islam and tries to expose their irrationality. He also announces planned demonstrations and asks the subscribers to support him financially.

“Therefore, there is only one way left for me to provide support, which is through my account on PayPal, so I will leave you a link to my account for everyone who wants to provide support, because we have demonstrations in different cities in Sweden, about 20 demonstrations, and these need your support to cover the costs of trips to multiple cities and far away, so I ask everyone to support. Always remember that your support makes me stronger. Thank you in advance. [Here is] My PayPal account link”

“A message from Salwan momika to those concerned: Stop your pressure on me, and if you try to pressure me more, I will submit hundreds of requests to burn the Koran. Do not try to play with professional players.”

“Urgent.. Swedish security bargains with us a little while ago. Protection in exchange for stopping the burning of the Quran, I will not stop and I do not want to protect you in return for restricting my freedom, as freedom is higher than life and what is in it. Salwan Momika.”

From the discussion that takes place in the comments, one can see that the audience is mainly Arabic-speaking, with both pro-Islamic and opposing views:

Comments under Irag’s request of Salwan’s extradition post express mainly support and concern, however, comment by Abdullah Abdulkareem translates as “Your day is approaching”.

Salwan Momika has been organizing Koran burning events several times since June. WNM team tracked how the rhetoric of users changed during this time, taking into account the discourse during the winter and spring events organized by Rasmus Paludan. Users were divided into those who supported Salwan’s act, those who stayed neutral and those who openly condemned the burning of a religious book.

Support for Momika’s actions is expressed in following posts:

Comment
byu/AymanSaleh from discussion
inExJordan
Comment
byu/AymanSaleh from discussion
inExJordan

Neutral ideas:

Comment
byu/AymanSaleh from discussion
inExJordan
Comment
byu/AymanSaleh from discussion
inExJordan

Burning of Koran is a hate speech:

Comment
byu/AymanSaleh from discussion
inExJordan

Swedish resource Flashback, which is presented as a largest forum for freedom of speech, opinions and independent thinking also offers a heated discussion on the issue. However, the main subjects discussed are tax payments to police for protection of such activities, condemnation of immigration policy including some Islamophobic comments.

Source: Kedox/ Flashback

“The Koran burning has served its purpose. It proved that Muslims go completely crazy and dangerous if you do something stupid with their book.

Then this guy comes along and wants to continue with something that’s already been done, raising the threat level against Sweden to the maximum. Kick this bastard out and tell him to burn a Koran in the Middle East.”

Source: Saftxbulle/ Flashback

“So, if you can’t burn books, Sweden is no longer a secularized country. It’s like people with low IQs who worship pink unicorns and other crap have won.

I don’t understand why people with low IQs are given so much room to spread their crappy culture instead of developing science or giving space for others to do so.”

Source: gg1337/ Flashback

“Reply to: “Even before he started, most people with more than two cooperating brain cells knew that the global reaction would be like this. There’s no need for anyone to try to convince repeatedly. The book is more than a religion.

This pathetic chaos leads NOWHERE except terrorist attacks against Sweden and the absence of NATO membership. That’s primarily what it’s about, and nothing else. Let’s call a spade a spade.

Freedom of speech is not a given. With freedom comes responsibility.”
“It seems to lead somewhere. It highlights the kind of animals and barbarians we have in the country. Unfortunately, it seems that Swedes hate freedom, and more than half are in favor of a ban on these actions.”

Source: Krimkoll/ Flashback

“It’s great that he’s going to burn it 20 more times. I hope more people are inspired and start burning it too. Maybe Rasmus Paludan will return next spring when it’s an election year. Islam is crap and should be removed from Sweden. The Koran should be banned. What is in the Koran incites hatred against ethnic groups. Islam is not a religion but a comprehensive and all-encompassing ism and ideology, at least as much, and one must be allowed to protest against it and show all their disgust for it.

It cannot be banned because then I want to burn pictures of Muhammad and Allah instead. I want to throw the Koran in a trash can, I want to stomp on it, I want to put it on a grill. It is impossible to prevent in a supposed democracy showing disapproval and disgust for Islam, the Koran, Muhammad, and more. There are endless possibilities, and to stop this, one must establish a very strict dictatorship, which those who advocate for mass immigration, population replacement, and Islam apparently want. You can introduce Sharia laws if you want to stop this list of possibilities to criticize, mock, and show disgust for Islam, the Koran, and Muhammad. But that’s what you want, so why not do it right away and show your true faces as traitors to the country? Of course, you should be able to criticize and mock the ideology of Islam; opposing that is the same as if you were to forbid the same left-wing scum from criticizing the Sweden Democrats and immigration critics. It’s exactly the same thing.”

As for international reaction, Salwan’s actions caused an even greater wave of negative reactions from the Muslim communities and leaders of countries around the world.

Source: Abbas Djuma/ Telegram

“This man is possessed by a demon. I truly feel sorry for him. But his entire state is also obsessed, having essentially declared war on Islam and Muslims. A war that Sweden will certainly lose.”

Storming of the Swedish Embassy in Iraq:

Source: VOBLYA/Telegram

Actions against Sweden in Pakistan:

Source: VOBLYA/ Telegram

Billboards depicting Putin as a “guardian and protector of religion” in Lebanon:

Source: NEXTA Live/ Telegram

Thus, the burning of the Koran this year became another milestone in anti-Islamic rhetoric. The actions and demonstrations caused both important social and political resonance and consequences. For example, it is known that Sweden has raised the level of terrorist threat in the country, citing threats by such groups as Hezbollah, al Shabaab and al-Qa’ida.

Moreover, It is not surprising that Russia, which does not benefit from Sweden’s entry into NATO, is also trying to use the situation to its advantage. However, its attempts are limited only to propaganda efforts to win favor and support among the global Muslim community. There is a popular version that Russia ordered the first burnings of the Koran by Rasmus Paludan. However, direct evidence of this connection was not found. Also against this hypothesis works the fact that Rasmus Paludan and his party adhered to anti-Islamist and anti-immigrant views long before the issue of confrontation with Turkey over Sweden’s membership in NATO became relevant. So Rasmus might have his own motivation to perform such acts.

As follows from open discussions, the Islamophobic actions of both Rasmus Paludan and Salwan Momika naturally were met with both support and disapproval from the general public. However, one can also observe how the motivation and opinions of users have changed, as well as their expression of hatred towards the problem under discussion. It was after Salwan’s demonstrations that the problem assumed such a huge international scale, causing such a violent reaction. This may have been influenced by the background of the demonstrator (an Iraqi refugee who may be involved in the activity of Iranian militia) or the fact that he is actively requesting financial support for his actions. It is also widely believed that Momika may be doing this to gain Swedish protection or even citizenship and not to oppose and expose the harm of Islam as he’s been stating.

More from the author